5. Clinical Aspects Of Rehabilitation Treatment Of Patients With Terminal Colostomy After Radical Surgery For Cancer Of The Rectum

Authors

  • A.A. Khozhayev S.D.Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • B.K. Kaidarov S.D.Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • N.A. Amanbekov S.D.Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • K.U. Sabirov S.D.Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A.K. Dzhakipbaeva S.D.Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Downloads

Abstract

It is known that patients with rectal cancer belong to the category of cancer patients with the most pronounced degree of disability, which is primarily due to the high percentage of stoma operations in this pathology. In this situation, a comprehensive approach is needed to solve this problem. Thanks to the multi-component rehabilitation treatment in patients with rectal cancer with unnatural anus after radical surgery, including a certain algorithm when choosing the place of formation of the colonic terminal stoma, diet therapy, the use of funds and the order of care for the colostomy, methods of prevention and elimination of complications from the intestinal stoma, it was possible to achieve good functional results of treatment, expressed in a high coefficient of “labor rehabilitation”, which amounted to 71,3±4,9%. At the same time, every fifth stomic returned to the preoperative way of life independently, and the coefficient of “self-rehabil-itation”, which reflects the ratio of patients who returned to work without passing the MSEC, to the number treated for this localization, was 18,4±4,2%.

Keywords

oncology, rectal cancer, colos-tomy, quality of life

References

  1. Dinaux A.M., Leijssen L.G.J., Bordeianou L.G. et al. The Influence of screening on outcomes of clinically locally advanced rectal cancer. Journal of Gastroin-testinal Surgery. 2018;22(6):1052-1058
  2. Quinton M. Hatch, Kevin R. Kniery, Eric K. John-son. et al. Screening or symptoms? How do we detect colorectal cancer in an equal access health care system? Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2016;20(2):431-438
  3. Mariane Messias Reis Lima Silva, Samuel Aguiar Junior, Juliana de Aguiar Pastore et al. Late assess-ment of quality of life in patients with rectal carci-noma: comparison between sphincter preservation and definitive colostomy. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2018;33(8):1039-1045
  4. Simone Arolfo, Carolina Borgiotto, Giovanna Bosio et al. Preoperative stoma site marking: a simple prac-tice to reduce stoma-related complications. Tech-niques in Coloproctology. 2018;22(9):683–687
  5. Adiela Correa-Marinez, Jacob Grenabo, David Bock et al. The type of stoma matters – morbidity in pa-tients with obstructing colorectal cancer. Internation-al Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2018;33(12):1773-1780
  6. Nihar Ranjan Dash, Ragini Kilambi. Complications of intestinal stomas and their management. GI Surgery Annual. 2017:43-80
  7. Eugene F. Foley Stoma Retraction / Ischemia / Steno-sis. Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2015:443-448
  8. Manihas G.M., Fridman M.H., Orshanskij R.N. Pro-filaktika i lechenie striktur kolostom // Rossijskij onkologicheskij zhurnal. 2000;4:27-29. (In Russ.)

Published

2019-04-01

Issue

No. 1 (2019)

Section

Статьи