4. Preoperative Volumetry Of The Donor’S Liver In Related Liver Transplantation. Literature Review

Authors

  • Y. Kalshabay National Scientific Center of Surgery named after A.N. Syzganov, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A.U. Sagieva National Scientific Center of Surgery named after A.N. Syzganov, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • R.N. Tazhim National Scientific Center of Surgery named after A.N. Syzganov, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Downloads

Abstract

With the development of innovative technologies of liver resection and partial transplantation, the intra-vital assessment of organ volume is of great interest. This review presents the main methods of CT volumetry in the preoperative assessment of donor liver volume, provides an analysis of the available literature data, identifies the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Liver transplantation in terms of frequency is on the 2nd place in the world after kidney transplan-tation. According to the WHO, up to 20 thousand liver transplants are performed annually in the world (14.6% of the donor during his lifetime). Liver transplantation from a related donor has been carried out in Kazakhstan since 2011. As of December 2018, 283 liver transplant procedures were performed at 5 transplant centers in Kazakh-stan.

Keywords

Computed tomography, transplantation, volume

References

  1. Zh. Baimakhanov*, Sh. Kaniev, M. Doskhanov, Ch. Sadykov, E. Serikuly, A. Skakbayev, B. Ilyassova, D. Baiguissova, M. Seisembaev, A. Chormanov, B. Bai-makhanov Evolution of Liver Transplantation in Ka-zakhstan: Two-Era Experience of a Single Center, the First Report. Transplantation Proceedings, Volume 51, Issue 10 December 2019, Pages 3360-3363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.07.023
  2. Emiroglu R, Coskun M, Yilmaz U, Sevmis S, Ozcay F, Haberal M. Safety of multidetector computed tomog-raphy in calculating liver volume for living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:3576–8. DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.10.101
  3. Hashimoto T., Sugawara Y., Tamura S. et al. Estima-tion of standard liver vol- ume in Japanese living liver donors // Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatolo-gy.
  4. Heinemann A., Wischhusen F., Puschel K. et al. Stan-dard Liver Volume in the Cau- casian Population // Liver Transplantation and Surgery.
  5. Roberts J.P., Forsmark C., Lake J.R. et al. Liver Transplantation Today // Ann. Rev. Med.
  6. Samstein B., Emond J. Liver Transplants from Liv-ing Related Donors // Ann. Rev. Med.
  7. Yoneyama T., Fukukura Y., Kamimura K. et al. Efficacy of liver parenchymal enhan- cement and liver volume to standard liver volume ratio on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for estimation of liver function // Eur Radiol.
  8. Yu H. C., You H., Lee H. et al. Estimation of Standard Liver Volume for Liver Transplantation in the Korean Population // Liver Transplantation.
  9. Joshi R., Singh A., Jajoo N. et al. Accuracy and re-liability of palpation and per- cussion for detecting hepatomegaly: a ruralhospital based study // Indian J. Gastro- enterol.
  10. D’Onofrio M., Robertis R. de, Demozzi E. et al. Liver volumetry: Is imaging reliable? Personal experience and review of the literature // WJR.
  11. Alonso-Torres A., Fernandez Cuadrado J., Pinilla I. et al. Multidetector CT in the evaluation of potential living donors for liver transplantation // Radiograph-ics.
  12. Borchert D., Schuler A., Muche R. et al. Compari-son of Panorama Ultrasonog- raphy, Conventional B-Mode Ultrasonography, and Computed Tomography for Measuring Liver Size // Ultrashall in Med.
  13. Childs J. T., Esterman A., Thoirs K. A. Ultrasound measurements of the liver: an intra and inter-rater reliability study // Australian journal of ultrasound in medi- cine.
  14. Childs J.T., Esterman A.J., Thoirs K.A., Turner R.C. Ultrasound in the assess- ment of hepatomegaly: A simple technique to determine an enlarged liver us-ing reli- able and valid measurements // Sonography.
  15. Geraghty E.M., Boone J.M., McGahan J.P., Jain K. Normal organ volume as- sessment from abdominal CT // Abdom Imaging.
  16. Xiaoqi Lv, Yu Miao, Xiaoying Ren, Jianshuai Wu. The study and implementa- tion of liver volume measur-
  17. A. Baskiran, A.S. Kahraman, I. B. Cicek, T. Sahin, B. Isik, S. Yilmaz Preoperative evaluation of liver volume in living donor liver transplantation. North Clin Istanb. 2018; 5(1): 1–5
  18. Heymsfield SB, Fulenwider T, Nordlinger B, Barlow R, Sones P, Kutner M. Accurate measurement of liver, kidney, and spleen volume and mass by computerized axial tomography. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90:185–7. DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-90-2-185
  19. Strunk H, Stuckmann G, Textor J, Willinek W. Limita-tions and pitfalls of Couinaud’s segmentation of the liver in transaxial Imaging. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2472-2482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1885-9
  20. Mussin N, Sumo M, Lee KW, Choi Y, Choi JY, Ahn SW, et al. The correlation between preoperative volumetry and real graft weight: comparison of two volumetry programs. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017;92:214–20. DOI:10.4174/astr.2017.92.4.214
  21. Lee J, Kim N, Lee H, Seo JB, Won HJ, Shin YM, et al. Ef-ficient liver segmentation using a level-set method with optimal detection of the initial liver boundary from level-set speed images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2007;88:26-38. DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.07.005
  22. Nakayama Y, Li Q, Katsuragawa S, et al. Au- tomated hepatic volumetry for living related liver transplanta-tion at multisection CT. Ra- diology 2006;240(3):743–
  23. Hermoye L, Laamari-Azjal I, Cao Z, et al. Liver seg-mentation in living liver transplant donors: compari-son of semiautomatic and manual methods. Radiol-ogy 2005; 234(1): 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1148/ radiol. 2341031801
  24. Kyoung W, Jeongjin L, Ho L, Woo K, Hyung J, Yong M, Dong-Hwan J, Jeong I, Gi-Won S, Tae-Yong H, Deok-Bog M, Ki-Hun K, Chul-Soo A, Shin H, Sung-Gyu L. Right Lobe Estimated Blood-free Weight for Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Accuracy of Au-tomated Blood-free CT Volumetry—Preliminary Re-sults. Gastrointestinal Imaging Vol. 256, No. 2; 2010, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091897
  25. Satou, S., Sugawara, Y., Tamura, S. et al. Discrep-ancy between estimated and actual weight of partial liver graft from living donors. J Hepatobiliary Pancre-at Sci 18, 586–591 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00534-011-0374-9

Published

2020-12-01

Issue

No. 4 (2020)

Section

Статьи