5. Transabdominal bowel ultrasound as a method of primary diagnosis in acute bowel pathology: literature review and demonstration of clinical cases

Authors

  • M.V. Fedossina JSC “Research Institute of Cardiology and Internal Diseases”, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • D.A. Kaybullaeva JSC “Research Institute of Cardiology and Internal Diseases”, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A.E. Dzhumabaeva JSC “Research Institute of Cardiology and Internal Diseases”, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • K.E. Murzalin JSC “Research Institute of Cardiology and Internal Diseases”, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Zh.А. Kanash JSC “Research Institute of Cardiology and Internal Diseases”, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • O.T. Ibekenov JSC «Syzganov National Scientific Center of Surgery», Almaty, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35805/BSK2023IV005

Downloads

Abstract

Currently, transabdominal ultrasound of the bowel is rarely used in daily routine practice to assess bowel condition due to the difficulty of its visualization, lack of awareness of specialists, and also due to the limited number of specialists who know the technique of bowel examination. Patients with acute bowel pathology seek emergency care in more than one third of cases. Gastrointestinal ultrasound is often used as the first imaging modality with good diagnostic accuracy in the setting of acute abdomen and may be the optimal diagnostic strategy in young women because of the radiation burden associated with X-ray and computer tomography scan. The clinician can examine the gastrointestinal tract in the area of greatest pain using ultrasound, thus obtaining more information and pathology data than standard physical examination. Intestinal ultrasound is mainly used for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, which helps to avoid the frequent use of invasive and expensive diagnostic procedures and leads to the early implementation of suitable treatment. This method can also serve to detect other pathological conditions present in the gastrointestinal tract. It is a promising method with high sensitivity and specificity, which has the advantage of being easily accessible, non-invasive, safe, due to the absence of ionising radiation and the need to use contrast agents. In addition, the advantage of this method is the reduction of diagnostic search, which allows the doctor to establish the diagnosis in a shorter time, as well as to reduce the patient’s expenses for expensive examinations.

Keywords

Intestinal ultrasound, small bowel, large bowel

References

  1. Smereczyński A, Kołaczyk K. Ultrasound diagnostics of bowel diseases in adults. Paediatrics and Family Medicine. 2015;11(2):157
  2. Nylund K, Maconi G, Hollerweger A, et al. EFSUMB recommendations and guidelines for gastrointestinal ultrasound-part 1: examination techniques and normal findings (long version). Ultraschall in der Medizin-European Journal of Ultrasound. 2017;38(03):e1-e15
  3. Boccatonda A, D’Ardes D, Tallarico V, et al. Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in Emergency Setting. J Clin Med. Jan 19 2023;12(3) doi:10.3390/jcm12030799
  4. Lahaye MJ, Lambregts DM, Mutsaers E, et al. Mandatory imaging cuts costs and reduces the rate of unnecessary surgeries in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of having appendicitis. Eur Radiol. May 2015;25(5):1464-70. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3531-0
  5. Dirks K, Calabrese E, Dietrich CF, et al. EFSUMB Position Paper: Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS) in Acute Appendicitis and Diverticulitis. Ultraschall Med. Apr 2019;40(2):163-175. doi:10.1055/a-0824-6952
  6. Zhang H, Liao M, Chen J, Zhu D, Byanju S. Ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging-which is preferred for acute appendicitis in children? A Meta-analysis. Pediatric radiology. 2017;47:186-196
  7. Yakan S, Caliskan C, Makay O, Denecli AG, Korkut MA. Intussusception in adults: clinical characteristics, diagnosis and operative strategies. World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28 2009;15(16):1985-9. doi:10.3748/wjg.15.1985
  8. Marinis A, Yiallourou A, Samanides L, et al. Intussusception of the bowel in adults: a review. World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28 2009;15(4):407-11. doi:10.3748/wjg.15.407
  9. Paul C, Anderson S. The Correlation Between Pediatric Intussusceptions and Celiac Disease. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. 2019;35(5):419-424
  10. AlAhmad M, Almessabi A. Transient Small-Bowel Intussusception Unmasking Adult Celiac Disease. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2022;16(1):44-48. doi:10.1159/000521542
  11. Akbulut S. Intussusception due to inflammatory fibroid polyp: a case report and comprehensive literature review. World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28 2012;18(40):5745-52. doi:10.3748/wjg.v18.i40.5745
  12. Gottlieb M, Peksa GD, Pandurangadu AV, Nakitende D, Takhar S, Seethala RR. Utilization of ultrasound for the evaluation of small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. Feb 2018;36(2):234-242. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.07.085
  13. Hollerweger A, Maconi G, Ripolles T, et al. Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS) in Intestinal Emergencies - An EFSUMB Position Paper. Ultraschall Med. Dec 2020;41(6):646-657. doi:10.1055/a-1147-1295
  14. Hollerweger A, Wüstner M, Dirks K. Bowel Obstruction: Sonographic Evaluation. Ultraschall Med. Jun 2015;36(3):216-35; quiz 236-8. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1399292
  15. Hefny AF, Corr P, Abu-Zidan FM. The role of ultrasound in the management of intestinal obstruction. J Emerg Trauma Shock. Jan 2012;5(1):84-6. doi:10.4103/0974-2700.93109

Published

2023-12-22

Section

Статьи