1. Our Experience Of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy In Tumors Of The Periampullary Zone

Authors

  • S.T. Tileuov National Scientific Center of Surgery named after A.N. Syzganov, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A.T. Dzhumabekov Казахстанский медицинский университет “ВШОЗ”, г. Алматы, Казахстан
  • B.B. Baimakhanov National Scientific Center of Surgery named after A.N. Syzganov, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • M.O. Doskhanov National Scientific Center of Surgery named after A.N. Syzganov, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • A.T. Chormanov National Scientific Center of Surgery named after A.N. Syzganov, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • Sh.M. Teipov Kazakh National Medical University named after S.D. Asfendiyarov, Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • B.T. Askeev National Scientific Center of Surgery named after A.N. Syzganov, Almaty, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35805/BSK2023II001

Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of research is to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in tumors of the periampullary zone..

Material and methods. In the period from 2016 to 2022 at the Syzganov National Scientific Center of Surgery, 193 patients underwent PD with a diagnosis of a tumor of the periampullary zone. Of these, 6 patients were performed laparoscopically. All patients who underwent LPD were female. The age of the patients ranged from 15 to 77 years (average age – 55,7 years)..

Results. In 4 (66.7%) patients, cancer of Ampulla of Vater was detected, in 2 (33.3%) pancreatic head cancer. According to the final histology data, adenocarcinoma and the degree of differentiation G2 were detected in all cases. Data on the histology and size of the tumor are summarized in Table 1. The average age of patients was 55.7 years. All patients had a clinic of mechanical jaundice before surgery; the average levels of bilirubin in the blood were 121.3 mmol/l. Accordingly, all patients underwent drainage of the biliary tract. Of these, 5 (83.3%) patients underwent percutaneous stenting and 1 (16.7%) endobiliary stenting..

Conclusion. Thus, we presented our initial experience of performing laparoscopic PD. Our results shows the feasibility of laparoscopic PD safely and radically for tumors of the periampullary zone in certain cases. The accumulation of experience in such interventions leads to an improvement in immediate results and a reduction in postoperative complications, the operative time.

Keywords

pancreatoduodenectomy, laparoscopic, pancreaticojejunoanastomosis, consistency of pancreas

References

  1. Hat’kov I.E., Cvirkun V.V., Izrailov R.E., Vasnev O.S., Bajchorov M.E., Tyutyunnik P.S., Hisamov A.A., Andrianov A.V., Mihnevich M.V. Laparoskopicheskaya pankreatoduodenal’naya rezekciya: evolyuciyarezul’tatov 215 operacij. Annaly Hirurgicheskoj Gepatologii, 2018, tom 23, No1. DOI:10.16931/19955464.2018147-54
  2. Mingjun Wang., Hua Zhang., Zhong Wu., Zhaoda Zhang., Bing Peng. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. DOI 10.1007/s00464-015-4154-5
  3. Xin Wang, Yunqiang Cai, Jingwen Jiang, Bing Peng, Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Outcomes and Experience of 550 Patients in a Single Institution. Ann Surg Oncol, https://doi. org/10.1245/s10434-020-08533-3
  4. Michael L. Kendrick, MD; Daniel Cusati, MD. Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Feasibility and Outcome in an Early Experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):19-23
  5. Kuroki T, Adachi T, Okamoto T, Kanematsu T. A non-randomized comparative study of laparoscopy assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2012, 59:570–573
  6. Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo K, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 2014, 260:633–640
  7. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: over-all outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grad-ing System. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:810–819
  8. Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc 2012;26:2397e2402
  9. Al-Taan OS, Stephenson JA, Briggs C, Pollard C, Metcalfe MS, Dennison AR Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a review of present results and future prospects. HPB (Oxford) 2010, 12:239–243
  10. Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1(1):20–25 discussion 25–6
  11. Qin H., Qiu J., Zhao Y., Pan G., Zeng Y. Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (8): e104274. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0104274
  12. Goh BK, Lee SY, Chan CY, et al. Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopichepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery in Singapore: single-institution experiencewith 20 consecutive patients. Singapore Med J 2018; 59:133-8
  13. Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy:a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 2015; 29:9-23
  14. Kendrick ML. Laparoscopic and robotic resection for pancreatic cancer. CancerJ 2012; 18:571-6
  15. Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonté F, Morel P. Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art. W J Surg. 2013;37(12):2812‐2819
  16. Buchs N.C., Addeo P., Bianco F.M., et al. Roboticversus openpancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. WorldJ Surg 2011; 35:2739-46
  17. Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Aussilhou B, Bensafta Y, Lévy P, Ruszniewski P, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220:831-838
  18. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1199–1210
  19. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 2006;244: 10–15
  20. Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H, Sick O, Makowiec F,Höppner J, Hopt UT, Keck T. A simple scoring system based onclinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperativepancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB (Oxford) 2010; 12: 696-702, DOI:10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00239.x]
  21. Zhang H, Zhu F, Shen M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three methods of pancreatic remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy. BrJ Surg. 2015; 102(1):4-15. 10.1002/bjs.9653
  22. Pan J, Ge X, Zhou W, Zhong X, Gu L, Zhu X, Li X, Qi W, Wang X. Comparison of clinical outcomes between mesh-reinforced pancreatojejunostomy and pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a cohort study. World of J Surg Onc. 2018; 16(1):190. doi:10.1186/s12957-018-1491-6
  23. Makni A, Bedioui H, Jouini M, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy vs. pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy: Results of comparative study. Minerva Chir2011;66:295– 302
  24. Yang SH, Dou KF, Sharma N, Song WJ. The methods of reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 2011;35:2290–2297
  25. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 2000;232:419–429
  26. Yu-Ni Lee, and Woo-Young Kim, et al. Comparison of Blumgart versus conventional duct-to-mucosa anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2018;22:253-260. doi. org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.3.25 OUR EXPERIENCE OF LAPAROSCOPIC PANCREATODUODENECTOMY IN TUMORS OF THE PERIAMPULLARY ZONE

Published

2023-05-16

Issue

No. 2 (2023)

Section

Статьи