7. Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of A Closed Circuit In Comparison With An Open Circuit Of Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Authors

  • B.S. Tuishiev JSC «A.N. Syzganov National Scientific Center for Surgery», Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • G.N. Bayzhan JSC «A.N. Syzganov National Scientific Center for Surgery», Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • S.B. Samitova JSC «A.N. Syzganov National Scientific Center for Surgery», Almaty, Kazakhstan

Downloads

Abstract

Objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of closed-loop surgeries with the planned duration of cardiopulmonary bypass more than 2 hours in the immediate postoperative period..

Materials and methods. A study was carried out in the clinic over 10 patients (average age 47-56 years) with Diagnoses: Ascending aortic aneurysm, FC 3 aortic valve insufficiency, who underwent surgery for ascending aorta replacement, aortic valve replacement with coronary artery reimplantation. The patients were divided into 2 groups, the 1st group (5 patients) is the control group using an open cardiopulmonary bypass circuit, the 2nd group (5 patients) is the patients using a closed cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. The total time of cardiopulmonary bypass in both groups was 125-187 minutes..

Results. In the 2nd study group, drainage blood loss significantly decreased, on average 60-100 ml compared to the control group, where the average drainage loss was 600-1500 ml. The need for blood transfusion was 5.1% in the 2nd group, compared with 43.4% in the control group. In the study group 2, the number of platelets in the postoperative period in patients was higher than in the control group..

Conclusion. This study shows that a closed circuit, compared to an open one, allows complex heart surgeries with a planned duration of extracorporeal circulation of more than 2-3 hours.

Keywords

cardiopulmonary bypass

References

  1. Raed A Alsatli. Mini cardiopulmonary bypass: Anes-thetic considerations Jan-Jun 2012;6(1):10-3. doi:10.4103/0259-1162.103364
  2. Liu G, Zeng QD, Zheng Z, Wang GY, Diao XL, Zhang X, Ji BY. Clinical application of modified minimally cardiopulmonary bypass: compared with convention-al cardiopulmonary bypass 2016 Aug 1;54(8):613-6. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.08.012
  3. Woodman RC, Harker LA. Bleeding Complications Associated With Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Blood. 1990;76:1680–97
  4. Perthel M, El-Ayoubi L, Bendisch A, Laas J, Gerigk M. Clinical advantages of using mini-bypass systems in terms of blood product use, postoperative bleed-ing and air entrainment: An in vivo clinical perspec-tive. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;31:1070–5
  5. Davy C.H Cheng, Janet Martin, Tirone David (2020) Evidence-Based Practice in Perioperative Cardiac Anesthesia and Surgery, Springer Nature Switzerland AG ISBN: 9783030478865

Published

2021-11-15

Issue

No. 3 (2021)

Section

Статьи