2. Combined one-stage plasty of a total defect in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery

Authors

  • A. Dossan Medical center “Medical Park”, Kazakhstan Medical University “Higher School of Public Health”, Almaty, Kazakhstan, доказательной медицины и биостатистики, Казахстанский медицинский университет «Высшая школа общественного здравоохранения», г. Алматы, Казахстан
  • S. Nurmaganov Medical center “Medical Park”, Kazakhstan Medical University “Higher School of Public Health”, Almaty, Kazakhstan, доказательной медицины и биостатистики, Казахстанский медицинский университет «Высшая школа общественного здравоохранения», г. Алматы, Казахстан
  • A. Dzhumabekov Medical center “Medical Park”, Kazakhstan Medical University “Higher School of Public Health”, Almaty, Kazakhstan, доказательной медицины и биостатистики, Казахстанский медицинский университет «Высшая школа общественного здравоохранения», г. Алматы, Казахстан

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35805/BSK2023I002

Downloads

Abstract

Nasal defects are a common human pathology and are formed as a result of trauma, removal of neoplasms or congenital pathology. Elimination of a nose defect is a complex problem of reconstructive surgery. Historically, information about the restoration of the nose dates back to 3000 years BC. In the post-war years the F. M. Khitrov method (1) was widely used in the USSR, which has not lost its relevance at the present time. The advantage of the method is the possibility of harvesting a sufficient volume of tissues for both side, the outer cover and the inner lining and the creating conditions for forming the nose frame. The disadvantage of the method is multi-stage, the risk of violation of the trophic flap at the stages of treatment, inconsistency of texture and color to local tissues. The aim of the work is to improve methods for eliminating total nasal defects. On the example of one clinical case, a method for restoring the main anatomical structures of the nose is described. The use of autologous cartilage and a paramedian forehead flap is the optimal solution for the elimination of total nasal defects.

Keywords

facial plastic surgery, nasal defect, paramedian forehead flap, surgery planning

References

  1. Михельсон Н.М. Восстановительные операции челюстно­лицевой об­ ласти. М.: Медгиз; 1962. [Mihel’son N.M. Vosstanovitel’nye operacii chelyustno­licevoj ob­ lasti. M.: Medgiz; 1962.]
  2. Неробеев А.И. Восстановление тканей головы и шеи сложными арте­ риализированными лоскутами. М.: Медицина; 1988. [Nerobeev A.I. Vosstanovlenie tkanej golovy i shei slozhnymi arte­ rializirovannymi loskutami. M.: Medicina; 1988.]
  3. Menick FJ. A 10-year experience in nasal reconstruction with the three-stage forehead flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(6):1839-1855
  4. McCarthy JG et al. The median forehead flap revisited: the blood supply. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:866
  5. Konig F. On filling defects of the nostril wall. Berl Klin Woch. 1902;39:137
  6. Brown JB, Cannon B. Composite free grafts of skin and cartilage from the ear. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1946;82:253
  7. Burget GC, Menick FJ. Nasal support and lining: the marriage of beauty and blood supply. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:189
  8. Larsen J. Limits for the use of forehead flaps for small and extensive midface reconstructions including septum/ columella reconstructions. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1978;31(3):229
  9. Ortiz-Monasterio F. Labat and the three-lobed forehead flap (Letter). Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73:705
  10. Gillies H. The columella. Br J Plast Surg. 1950;2:192
  11. Millard R. Reconstructive rhinoplasty for the lower two-thirds of the nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;57:4:722-735

Published

2023-02-22

Issue

No. 1 (2023)

Section

Статьи