3. Comparative analysis of the results of hemorrhoidectomy by traditional methods and the «HAL-RAR» method
Downloads
Abstract
In this study, we present the results of a retrospective comparative analysis of the results of hemorrhoidectomies by traditional methods and the «HAL-RAR» method. The purpose of the study. To conduct a retrospective comparative analysis of the results of traditional hemorrhoidectomies and «HAL-RAR» in patients treated in surgical departments of “A. N. Syzganov National Scientific Center for Surgery” JSC, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Material and methods. In the period from June 2018 to April 2021, 108 patients were operated on as planned for chronic hemorrhoids at A. N. Syzganov National Scientific Center for Surgery, and all patients were divided into 2 main groups: those operated by traditional methods and the «HAL-RAR» method.
Results. The analysis data suggest that the «HAL-RAR» method has an advantage over traditional methods of hemorrhoidectomy.
Conclusion. Based on a comparative analysis of the indicators of patients of both groups, it can be concluded that the duration of surgery with the minimally invasive «HAL-RAR» method is 40.6 minutes, which is significantly longer than with traditional methods, amounting to 48.4 minutes. Despite this, the duration of hospital stay after surgery by the «HAL-RAR» method is 2.6 days, which is much less than with traditional methods, in which the duration of hospital stay after surgery is 3.5 days. Local infiltration anesthesia during operations by the «HAL-RAR» method was performed by 77.7% of patients, when with traditional methods 25.9% of patients. This analysis shows that the «HAL-RAR» method has an advantage over traditional methods.
Keywords
chronic hemorrhoids
References
- Vorobyev G.I., ShelyginYu.A., Grateful L.A. Hemorrhoids: A guide for doctors. - M.: Litterra, 2010.- 200 p.5
- Rivkin V.L., Bronstein A.S., Fine S.N. Guide to coloproctology. - M.: From-in «Medpraktika, 2001. - 300 p
- MEDICAL COUNCIL, A.I. Parfenov, MD, Professor, Central Research Institute of Gastroenterology, Moscow 2010- pp.17-22
- Hemorrhoids. A.I.Parfenov «Medical Council», No. 9-10, pp. 13-18. Moscow, 2010
- Atlas of gastrointestinal surgery / John L. Cameron, Corinne Sandone - Second Edition. -2014. pp. 677-678
- Vorobyev G.I., ShelyginYu.A., Grateful L.A. Hemorrhoids. – M.: Littera, 2010. – S. 38-40, 114-116, 137-138, 154-183
- Dal Monte P.P., Tagariello S., Sarago M. et al. Transanaldearterialization of hemorrhoids: non-extractive surgery for the treatment of hemorrhoidal diseases. Technical Coloproctol 2007;11:333-8; discussion 8-9
- Bursiks A., Morvey K., Kupchsulik P., Flautner L. Comparison of early and 1-year results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoidal artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19:176-80
- Gupta P.J., Kalaskar S., Taori S., Kheda P.S. Ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries under Doppler control does not give any advantages compared to ligation of sutures in symptomatic hemorrhoids of the 3rd degree. Technical Coloproctol 2011
- Festen S., van Hoogstraten M.Ya., van Geloven A.A., Gerhards M.F. Treatment of grade III and IV hemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. Randomized study on postoperative complications and short-term results. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24:1401-5