5. Evaluation of ultrasonic dissection technology in reducing post-mastectomy syndrome rates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35805/BSK2025I005Жүктеулер
Аңдатпа
Background. Post-mastectomy syndrome, characterized by chronic pain, lymphedema, and functional impairment, remains a significant complication following breast cancer surgery. This study evaluates the efficacy of ultrasonic dissection technology in reducing morbidity associated with post-mastectomy syndrome compared with conventional electrocautery during axillary lymph node dissection.
Methods. A prospective study enrolled 53 female patients (aged 29–81 years) undergoing Madden technique mastectomy, stratified into ultrasonic dissection technology (n=25) and electrocautery (n=28) groups. Primary outcomes included operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, drainage metrics, and 30-day complication rates. Both groups exhibited comparable demographics, with high body mass index prevalence (64% overweight/obese) but balanced intergroup distribution.
Results. Ultrasonic dissection technology’s cavitational mechanism preserved neurovascular and lymphatic structures, potentially mitigating long-term lymphedema risks. Despite equivalent short-term complication rates, ultrasonic dissection technology enhanced operative efficiency without compromising safety. The ultrasonic dissection technology cohort demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in operative time, p<0.001, attributed to streamlined hemostasis and reduced instrument swaps. Significant differences were observed in drainage volume, blood loss anddrainage duration (p<0.001), overall postoperative complications. Conclusions. Ultrasonic dissection technology represents a promising advancement in oncologic surgery, offering faster procedures and economic advantages while maintaining safety. This study underscores ultrasonic dissection technology’s potential to refine surgical precision and improve postoperative recovery trajectories in breast cancer care.
Кілт сөздер
mastectomy, ultrasonic devices, axillary lymphadenectomy
Әдебиеттер тізімі
- Xu H, Xu B. Breast cancer: Epide-miology, risk factors and screen-ing. Chin J Cancer Res. Dec 30 2023;35(6):565-583. doi:10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.06.02
- Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Newman LA, et al. Breast cancer statistics
- Salati SA, Alsulaim L, Alharbi MH, et al. Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review. Cureus. Oct 2023;15(10):e47384. doi:10.7759/cu-reus.47384
- Gong Y, Tan Q, Qin Q, Wei C. Preva-lence of postmastectomy pain syn-drome and associated risk factors: A large single-institution cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). May 2020;99(20):e19834. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000019834
- Yuksel SS, Chappell AG, Jackson BT, Wescott AB, Ellis MF. "Post Mastec-tomy Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Prevention Modalities". JPRAS Open. Mar 2022;31:32-49. doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2021.10.009
- Morikawa T, Hamamoto S, Gonda M, et al. Evaluation of thermal effects of surgical energy devices: ex vivo study. Sci Rep. Nov 9 2024;14(1):27365. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-78624-8
- Adrien C, Katia M, Marie-Lucile B, Alice R, Claire B, Roman R. Preven-tion of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymph-adenectomy for breast cancer: sys-tematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. Jun 15 2022;12(1):10016. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-13831-9
- Tian Y, Han L, Ma X, et al. Comparison of the effect of ultrasounic-harmon-ic scalpel and electrocautery in the treatment of axillary lymph nodes during radical surgery for breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. Apr 11 2024;22(1):91. doi:10.1186/s12957-024-03381-x
- Mitsuyoshi A, Inoguchi K, Yokoya-ma D. The Cavitron ultrasonic sur-gical aspirator with a low ampli-tude is a useful dissection device for surgical procedures: application to vascular detachment and lymph node dissection. Updates Surg. Jun 2016;68(2):205-9. doi:10.1007/s13304-016-0360-5
- Merajikhah A, Imani B, Khazaei S, Bouraghi H. Impact of Surgical Smoke on the Surgical Team and Operating Room Nurses and Its Reduction Strategies: A Systemat-ic Review. Iran J Public Health. Jan 2022;51(1):27-36. doi:10.18502/ijph.v51i1.8289
- Deori A, Gupta N, Gupta AK, Yela-manchi R, Agrawal H, Durga CK. A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Ultrasonic Dissec-tor with Electrocautery for Axillary Dissection in Patients of Carcino-ma Breast. Malays J Med Sci. Feb 2021;28(1):97-104. doi:10.21315/mjms2021.28.1.12
- Shanmugam S, Govindasamy G, Hus-sain SA, Rao PSH. Axillary dissection for breast cancer using electrocau-tery versus ultrasonic dissectors: A prospective randomized study. Indi-an J Cancer. Jul-Sep 2017;54(3):543-546. doi:10.4103/ijc.IJC_289_17
- Velotti N, Limite G, Vitiello A, Berardi G, Musella M. Flap fixation in prevent-ing seroma formation after mastec-tomy: an updated meta-analysis. Up-dates Surg. Aug 2021;73(4):1307-1314. doi:10.1007/s13304-021-01049-9
- Kim KE, Park H, Bae SH, Hwang BY, Kang T. Usefulness of using ad-ditional ultrasonic dissection de-vice in breast cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Gland Surg. Dec 2021;10(12):3181-3187. doi:10.21037/gs-21-643
- Lee D, Jung BK, Roh TS, Kim YS. Ultrasonic dissection versus elec-trocautery for immediate pros-thetic breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. Jan 2020;47(1):20-25. doi:10.5999/aps.2019.00759
- Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M. Understanding Costs of Care in the Operating Room. JAMA Surg. Apr 18
- Aleixo GFP, Valente SA, Wei W, Moore HCF. Association of body composi-tion and surgical outcomes in pa-tients with early-stage breast can-cer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. Nov 2023;202(2):305-311. doi:10.1007/s10549-023-07060-5
- Cotterell A, Griffin M, Downer MA, Parker JB, Wan D, Longaker MT. Understanding wound healing in obesity. World J Exp Med. Mar 20 2024;14(1):86898. doi:10.5493/wjem.v14.i1.86898
- Liu J, Guo W, Tong M. Intraopera-tive indocyanine green fluorescence guidance for excision of nonpalpable breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. Oct 18 2016;14(1):266. doi:10.1186/s12957-016-1014-2
- Seki Y, Kajikawa A, Yamamoto T, Takeuchi T, Terashima T, Kurogi N. Real-time Indocyanine Green Vid-eolymphography Navigation for Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. May 2019;7(5):e2253. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002253
- Morris MX, Fiocco D, Caneva T, Yiapanis P, Orgill DP. Current and future applications of artificial intel-ligence in surgery: implications for clinical practice and research. Front Surg. 2024;11:1393898. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1393898