4. Comparative Assessment of Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Injury

Authors

  • T. Kuandykov Медицинский университет г. Семей, Семей, Республика Казахстан
  • V. Mutagirov Международный научный центр травматологии и ортопедии, Алматы, Республика Казахстан
  • B. Dostarbayev Медицинский университет г. Семей, Семей, Республика Казахстан
  • M. Agzamov Medical University, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Y. Voronin Государственное учреждение здравоохранения “Шымкентская городская многопрофильная больница”
  • A. Akshikeshov Medical University, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • T. Bidaibai Medical University, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • M. Tolepbergen Medical University, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • A. Sharipov Medical University, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35805/BSK2023IV004

Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate the results of surgical treatment in patients with sacroiliac joint injury.

Methods. An analysis of the results of surgical treatment of 60 patients with sacroiliac joint injury was conducted at the Center of polytrauma and orthopedic surgery of the State Public Healthcare Institution “Emergency Hospital” in Abai Region, the Trauma and Endoprosthetics Department of the State Public Healthcare Institution “Multispecialty City Hospital No. 1” in the city of Astana, and the “Shymkent City Clinical Hospital No. 1” from June 2019 to August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups. Patients in the control group underwent surgery using the standard technique, while patients in the experimental group underwent surgery using a device developed by us for minimally invasive locking osteosynthesis of sacroiliac joint injuries. The study was a randomized controlled trial by design..

Results. The use of the device for minimally invasive locking osteosynthesis of sacroiliac joint injuries leads to a significant reduction in the length of hospitalization for all types of sacroiliac joint injuries regardless of the patient’s initial condition (p=0.001). Correlation analysis revealed a correlation between the observation group and patient pain assessment at 12 months (p=0.001). According to the Majeed Pelvic Score at 12 months, the maximum score in the experimental group was 98 points, while in the control group, it was 70 points. A satisfactory assessment on the Majeed Pelvic Score at 12 months was observed in 3 (10%) of patients in the control group and none in the experimental group. There were no unsatisfactory responses in both groups (significant differences were found, p=0.001). Conclusions. The use of the device developed by us for minimally invasive locking osteosynthesis of sacroiliac joint injuries reduces the length of hospitalization and the time to return to work (12 months in the control group and 8 months in the experimental group). The absence of pain in patients after 12 months in the experimental group was 26 (86.7%) and 20 (66.6%) in the control group. According to the Majeed Pelvic Score in the long term (3, 6, and 12 months), the frequency of excellent results increases from 13.3% to 90.0% in the experimental group and from 10% to 73.4% in the control group.

Keywords

trauma, sacroiliac joint, minimally invasive locking osteosynthesis

References

  1. Pizanis A., Pohlemann T., Burkhardt M., Aghayev E., Holstein J.H. Emergency stabilization of the pelvic ring: Clinical comparison between three different techniques. Injury. Dec 2013;44(12):1760-4. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.009
  2. Pereira G.J.C., Damasceno E.R., Dinhane D.I., Bueno F.M., Leite J.B.R., Ancheschi B.D.C. Epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures and injuries. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017;52(3):260-269. doi:10.1016/j.rboe.2017.05.012
  3. Al-Hassani A., Afifi I., Abdelrahman H., et al. Concurrent rib and pelvic fractures as an indicator of solid abdominal organ injury. Int J Surg. 2013;11(6):483-6. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.04.002
  4. Kalinkin O. Itogi mnogoletnego opyta lecheniya postradavshikh s tyazhelymi povrezhdeniyami taza v ostrom i rannem periodakh travmaticheskoy bolezni. Travma. 2013;16(2):80-84
  5. Tilyakov A.B., Valiyev E., Ubaydullayev B. Primeneniye sterzhnevogo apparata vneshney fiksatsii v kompleksnom lechenii nestabil’nykh perelomov kostey taza pri sochetannoy travme. Zhurnal im N.V. Sklifosovskogo Neotlozhnaya meditsinskaya pomoshch 2014;(2):32-37
  6. Giannoudis P., Pape H-C. Principles of damage control for pelvic ring injuries. Damage Control Management in the Polytrauma Patient. 2017:219-232
  7. Donald D. Davis, Lisa A. Foris, Steven M. Kane, Muhammad Waseem. Pelvic Fracture. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan. 2023 Comparative Assessment of Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Injury May 1. doi: NBK430734
  8. Kasymov K., Tlemisov A., Zhunusov Ye., Toktarov Ye., Tlebaldyyeva A. Khirurgicheskoye lecheniye nestabil’nykh povrezhdenii zadnego polukol’tsa taza. Obzor literatury. Nauka i zdravookhraneniye. 2019;(5):11-22
  9. Breuil V., Roux C.H., Carle G.F. Pelvic fractures: epidemiology, consequences, and medical management. Curr Opin Rheumatol. Jul 2016;28(4):442-7. doi:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000293
  10. Dalbayrak S., Yaman O., Ayten M., Yilmaz M., Ozer A.F. Surgical treatment in sacral fractures and traumatic spinopelvic instabilities. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(4):498-505. doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.8980-13.0
  11. Kleweno C., Bellabarba C. Lumbopelvic fixation for pelvic fractures. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2015;25(4):270-281. doi:10.1053/j.oto.2015.09.001
  12. Wong J.M., Bewsher S., Yew J., Bucknill A., de Steiger R.. Fluoroscopically assisted computer navigation enables accurate percutaneous screw placement for pelvic and acetabular fracture fixation. Injury. 2015;46(6):1064-8. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.038
  13. Iorio J.A., Jakoi A.M., Rehman S. Percutaneous Sacroiliac Screw Fixation of the Posterior Pelvic Ring. Orthop Clin North Am. Oct 2015;46(4):511-21. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2015.06.005
  14. Krishnan B.H., Sharma Y., Magdum G. A retrospective analysis of percutaneous SI joint fixation in unstable pelvic fractures: Our experience in armed forces. Med J Armed Forces India. Jul 2016;72(3):231-5. doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.01.011
  15. Han G., Wang Z., Du Q., et al. Damage-control orthopedics versus early total care in the treatment of borderline high-energy pelvic fractures. Orthopedics. Dec 2014;37(12):e1091-100. doi:10.3928/01477447-20141124-57
  16. Majeed S.A. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Mar 1989;71(2):304-6. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.71B2.2925751
  17. Bajada S., Mohanty K. Psychometric properties including reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Majeed pelvic score in patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain. Eur Spine J. Jun 2016;25(6):1939-44. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4369-0
  18. Brouwers L., Wouter Lansink K.W., van Delft-Schreurs K., Cornelia de Jongh M.A. Differences in the Majeed Pelvic Score Between Injured and Uninjured Patients. J Orthop Trauma. May 2019;33(5):244-249. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001428
  19. Mann S.M., Banaszek D., Lajkosz K., et al. High-energy trauma patients with pelvic fractures: Management trends in Ontario, Canada. Injury. Oct 2018;49(10):1830-1840. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.044
  20. Bondarenko A., Gerasimova O., Luk’yanov V., Timofeyev V., Kruglykhin I. Sostav, struktura povrezhdeniy, letal’nost’ i osobennosti okazaniya pomoshchi u postradavshikh na etapakh lecheniya politravy. Politravma. 2014;(1):15-22
  21. Goncharov A., Samokhvalov I., Suvorov V., Markevich V., Pichugin A., Petrov A. Problemy etapnogo lecheniya postradavshikh s tyazhelymi sochetannymi travmami v usloviyakh regional’noy travmosistemy. Politravma. 2017;(4):6-15
  22. Kolesnik A., Dokalin A., Solodilov I., et al. Retrospektivnyy analiz rezul’tatov konservativnogo i operativnogo lecheniya bol’nykh s povrezhdeniyami taza. Chelovek i yego zdorov’ye. 2017;(2):17-23
  23. Perkins Z.B., Maytham G.D., Koers L., Bates P., Brohi K., Tai N.R. Impact on outcome of a targeted performance improvement programme in haemodynamically unstable patients with a pelvic fracture. Bone Joint J. Aug 2014;96-B(8):1090-7. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33383ComparativeAssessmentofSurgicalTreatmentOutcomesinPatientswithSacroiliacJointInjury

Published

2023-12-22

Issue

No. 4 (2023)

Section

Статьи